Pablo Picaso “Olga”

The characterization of Olga is a naturalistic portrayalure of Picassos wife. I speak up that the missing arm chair, the rear end, the darkness, and the paleness of Olga are a sign from Picasso that their relationship was non everlastingly so good. I assume this because from the rank http//www. sapergalleries. com/PicassoWomen. html I found that their nuptials had its ups and downs and they were two different people. This pic is soundly sundry(a). It gives me a feeling that Olga was present when Picasso painted this portrait. This woman is beautiful and I think that Picasso would paint his wife beautifully.The imperfections in the Olga portrait re sound judgment me of Picassos first Cubism painting, Les Demoiselles dAvignon because of the shadow in the patronise ground that does not seem to fit Olgas shape. If you project at the Cubism painting Picasso uses a serve up of shadow and fuzzy lines in the back ground behind the women. I retrieve that when you look at the Olga painting massive enough you can tell that is was not meant to be a perfect portrait of his wife therefore I deliberate that it is more of a cubist painting. That is really interesting because I thought that is looked as if the painting was done in person.Now that I know that he painted Olga from a photograph of her does not change my mind that the piece reflects the cubism paintings. In the other painting the women that Picasso pained the women look distorted and not human like. I bank that these women credibly were not painted by tantrum but by imagination and sensation of Pablo Picasso. All in all, I believe that Picasso had a talent of portraying women in many different ways. His work is charming and very different than a muckle of other artists work.